Social Research Methods

Product Information

In new 'Learn from experience' boxes, recent social science graduates from across the UK and Europe share their experiences of conducting a student research project. These candid accounts will inspire readers and help them to avoid common pitfalls and emulate successful approaches. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 246–255.

Maneesriwongul, W., & Dixon, J. K. (2004). Instrument translation process: a methods review. Journal of advanced nursing, 48(2), 175–186. Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2009). Positivism, social constructionism, critical realism: Three reference points in the philosophy of science. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, 15–52. The deductive approach develops the hypothesis or hypotheses upon a pre-existing theory and then formulates the research approach to test it (Silverman, 2013). This approach is best suited to contexts where the research project is concerned with examining whether the observed phenomena fit with expectation based upon previous research (Wiles et al., 2011). The deductive approach thus might be considered particularly suited to the positivist approach, which permits the formulation of hypotheses and the statistical testing of expected results to an accepted level of probability (Snieder & Larner, 2009). However, a deductive approach may also be used with qualitative research techniques, though in such cases the expectations formed by pre-existing research would be formulated differently than through hypothesis testing (Saunders et al., 2007). The deductive approach is characterised as the development from general to particular: the general theory and knowledge base is first established and the specific knowledge gained from the research process is then tested against it (Kothari, 2004). Henderson, K. A. (2011). Post-positivism and the pragmatics of leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 33, 341–346.Gulati, P. M. (2009). Research Management: Fundamental and Applied Research, New Delhi: Global India Productions. Epple, D., Romano, R., Sarpça, S., & Sieg, H. (2017). A general equilibrium analysis of state and private colleges and access to higher education in the US. Journal of Public Economics, 155, 164–178. Regularly-updated video reflections from the authors on the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on social research The research onion provides an effective progression through which a research methodology can be designed. Its usefulness lies in its adaptability for almost any type of research methodology and can be used in a variety of contexts (Bryman, 2012). This essay will examine and describe the different stages of the research onion, and explain the concepts at each stage.

Holden, M. T., & Lynch, P. (2004). Choosing the appropriate methodology: Understanding research philosophy. The Marketing Review, 4, 397–409. Osei-Frimpong, K., & Mclean, G. (2018). Examining online social brand engagement: A social presence theory perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 10–21.Jefferies). He has been an invited speaker at the Department for Education, Department for Work and Pensions, the European Parliament in Brussels, the House of Lords, and the UN in New York, as a world leading expert on ageing. Liam is a member of the UK Social Policy Association Executive Committee. He is also the Managing Editor of Social Policy and Society. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage.

Frisancho, V., & Krishna, K. (2016). Affirmative action in higher education in India: Targeting, catch up, and mismatch. Higher Education, 71, 611–649. Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2016). Identifying interesting project phenomena using philosophical and methodological triangulation. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 1043–1056. Ormston, R., Spencer, L., Barnard, M., & Snape, D. (2014). The foundations of qualitative research. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, 2, 52–55. Miller, K. E., & Waller, D. S. (2004). Attitudes towards DTC advertising in Australia: An exploratory study. International Journal of Advertising, 23, 389–405. The authors have worked closely with lecturers and students in thoroughly updating the sixth edition to reflect the current social science landscape, and carefully streamlining content to make it relevant and appealing to today's students. As a result, the text's comprehensive coverage - which includes many new examples and additional material on areas such as social media research and big data - is now even clearer, more focused, and easier to navigate.Provides lasting value by supporting social science students twice over: initially, as an essential companion for a research methods module, and later as an invaluable source of information and tips when conducting independent research. Chilisa, B., & Kawulich, B. (2012). Selecting a research approach: Paradigm, methodology, and methods (pp. 51–61). Fischer, C., & Gregor, S. (2011, May). Forms of reasoning in the design science research process. In International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems (pp. 17–31). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research Methods for Business Students, (6 th ed.) London: Pearson.